Depending on changes in the azimuth and angle of inclination of the panels are presented in the following instructions.

1. Change in total annual production depending on the azimuth change.

The reference production level is the total annual production with the azimuth set to 0 degrees and the slope angle of 25 degrees.
During tests, we maintain a constant distance between panels, a constant angle of inclination and a constant power value under steady conditions.

As you can see in the graphic above, our reference output is 16,396 kWh (Szacowana produkcja roczna). In the following sections, the photos will present the following values of the deviation from the azimuth towards the west in steps of 10 degrees.

1.1.The azimuth of the panels 10 degrees

1.2. The azimuth of the panels 20 degrees

1.3. The azimuth of the panels 30 degrees

1.4. The azimuth of the panels 40 degrees

1.5. The azimuth of the panels 50 degrees

1.6. The azimuth of the panels 60 degrees

1.7. The azimuth of the panels 70 degrees

1.8. The azimuth of the panels 80 degrees

1.9. The azimuth of the panels 90 degrees

In conclusion, we see a clear decrease in power along with a stronger deflection of the installation from the south (or north depending on the hemisphere). The entire summary is presented below in graphic form.


Lp.
Azimuth [stopnie] Annual production[kWh]Decline in production[kWh]
00163960
1101637026
22016292104
33016166230
44015999397
55015798598
66015573823
770153331063
880150881308
990148511545

As we can see, to some extent the change in azimuth does not cause significant changes in the total annual production.
For example, changing the orientation of the panels relative to the south by 10 degrees causes a decrease in production by 15 kWh, but a change by 30 degrees already causes losses of 230 kWh, and a total change of position to the west direction is 1.55 MWh loss.

2. Changing the angle of inclination of the panels relative to the sea level.

In this section, we will discuss the change in total annual output relative to the change in the angle of inclination of the PV panels.
As a reference level, we will take the flat position of the panels, i.e. the angle of 0 degrees, no deviation from the south (azimuth 0 degrees) and constant power under steady conditions.
During the tests, the distance between the panels is kept constant and the shading and the area of the panels distribution related to the need for greater spacing of rows with increasing inclination angle are not taken into account.

As we can see, our reference production is 14 730 kWh (Szacowana produkcja roczna). In the following sections, the photos will present successive values of the tilt angle, changing in steps of 5 or 10 degrees.

2.1. The angle of inclination of the panels is 10 degrees

2.2. The angle of inclination of the panels is 15 degrees

2.3. The angle of inclination of the panels is 25 degrees

2.4. The angle of inclination of the panels is 30 degrees

2.5. The angle of inclination of the panels is 35 degrees

2.6. The angle of inclination of the panels is 40 degrees

2.7. The angle of inclination of the panels is 45 degrees

2.8. The angle of inclination of the panels is 50 degrees

2.9. The angle of inclination of the panels is 60 degrees

2.10. The angle of inclination of the panels is 70 degrees

2.11. The angle of inclination of the panels is 80 degrees

2.12. The angle of inclination of the panels is 89 degrees (it cannot be 90 degrees)

Lp.Inclination [stopnie]Annual production [kWh]Decline in production [kWh]
10147301783
21015613900
31515952561
42016214299
52516396117
6301649716
735165130
8401644568
94516293220
105016056457
1160153381175
1270143112202
1380130053508
1489116294884

As we can see, the values of the total annual production reach the highest value at the angle of inclination equal to 35 degrees. However, a setting between 30-40 degrees does not generate much visible losses in the total annual production. On the other hand, it is clearly visible that the inclination angle of less than 20 degrees and greater than 60 is unfavorable due to the fact that the annual losses there are already greater than 1 MWh.